- Intranet Home
- About the Faculty
- Information about staff
- Information for staff only
- Studying
- The College Taught Handbook
- 1. FAQ
- 2. You and the College of Humanities
- 3. Academic support
- 4. Your wellbeing
- 5. Your programme
- 6. Your modules
- 7. Assessment and feedback
- Degree classifications
- Marking scheme
- Draft essay policies
- Double-marking and moderation
- Assessment procedures for students with dyslexia or learning difficulties
- Cheating and plagiarism
- Submitting work
- Extensions, Deferrals and Mitigation
- Going over the word limit
- Calculating your word count
- Missing an Individual Assessed Presentation
- Missing an Assessed Group Presentation
- Missing an exam
- Illegible handwriting
- Assessment procedures for disabled or ill students
- Assessment procedures for overseas (incoming exchange) students
- Using a dictionary in exams
- Ethics clearance
- Failing your module
- Receiving results
- Re-taking an assessment
- Appeals
- External Examiners
- Study Abroad Mark Conversions
- Referencing
- Assessment criteria for Humanities coded modules
- 8 Employability matters
- 9. Useful terms
- Undergraduates
- Postgraduate taught
- Postgraduate research
- The College Taught Handbook
- Year Abroad
7.4 Double-marking and Moderation
All summative work (that is, all work which contributes to the classification of your award), both coursework and examination papers, will be either moderated or double marked. Individual disciplines decide which approach is appropriate for their subject at undergraduate level; moderation of marks is the minimum requirement expected of all markers.
Double marking is the process by which a piece of work is marked by two markers, who agree a final mark (or marks) for the purpose of classification. In ‘double blind’ marking, which is a version of double marking, neither marker is aware of the other’s assessment decision in formulating their own mark.
Moderation, as defined by the University, is the process by which marks are checked against feedback to ensure that the mark awarded is appropriate (for the purpose of assuring the standard of the award). Departmental practices may vary slightly, as appropriate for particular forms of assessment. Please consult departmental handbooks or personal tutors.
For further information please consult the University’s Handbook for Assessment, Progression and Awarding: Taught Programmes.